Pot Smokers Must Choose: Guns Or Pot?
DO YOU BENEFIT FROM CANNABIS LIKE I DO???
January 22, 2014
My Medicinal marijuana grow update 2014
January 23, 2014
“The Illinois Department of Public Health on Tuesday unveiled their proposed rules for the state’s medical marijuana pilot program — including several propo…
50 Comments
YAY! I’m in Illinois! “oh, Everything is better with a bag of weed…”
It just seems the government just can’t resist telling people what to do
o_0
Democrats…
love the last comment made towards the end of this clip. All these stupid
fucking politicians do is talk out their asses! Have NO IDEA about the
science behind marijuana. All they base it on is taboo talk and what their
masters have told them. They have no idea how to implement critical
thinking! argh! I am so ashamed to be human at this point :/
Excellent point by John at the end there.
fuck the NRA and fuck the government Im an adult and Ill smoke pot and have
a gun until death do us part.
Most of these restrictions will never survive a court challenge, nor should
they.
More people are killed by guns and alcohol, but of course they can keep
their guns…
I say shoot science with your gun! ha! …ok, I really don’t…
I CHOOSE BOTH BITCH! FUCK THE POLICE!
Why do you libs care? You support confiscation, so this is your dream
bill. And you think paying money, etc to get medical weed is
obstructionist? To get my concealed carry permit in Illinois, I have to
take 16 hours of classes (most in the country), pay a ton of money and take
tests, get my own picture taken, etc. So save the bullshit.
I’m dangerously creative when I’m high, I’m much more likely to think
outside the box.
Simply put, alcohol should be a controlled substance as well.
Unconstitutional.
The very fact that scientists can’t use the scientific method to reliably
win every election demonstrates that you really don’t want to mix science
and politics.
All kinds of bad things happen when you try that, partly because for
science to work properly it must always treat its own output as
provisional. Politics deals in “facts”, not science.
oh, the plastic surgery queer supports the “scientific method”? lets start
with admitting that blacks have lower iq scores than whites.
whoops. that doesn’t fit the communist agenda.
4:28 Brilliant
Well considering smoking lots of pot has this risk of developing various
mental disorders, which only really applies if you were at risk in the
first place as well and also only applies to high THC low oh I forgot the
other drug that is in marijuana but its basically been shown to much lower
the psychosomatic effects of THC.
But high potency marijuana has less of this drug and more THC so yeah.
But anyways my point was that considering that I don’t think its a bad
idea, although alcohol my make you temporally stupid and I think it should
be against the law to carry and drink.
But pot can break your brain so.
the people in charge of our country are not very smart . . . yup.
A stoned congress might solve a lot of problems. With the increase in
empathy. They would likely become a little more compassionate and might
get along better. Not like they could do any less work. I bet they would
not like all the secrecy we have if they were high. Although there is that
whole ability to declare war thing with a potential for increase in
paranoia. I bet C-Span would get better ratings.
(R) Congressman Rush Holt is a physicists.
NRA says NOTHING about an unconstitutional violation, A LEGITIMATE
VIOLATION OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT, but they raise a shit fit over 85-95% of
the American people saying “We want universal background checks for firearm
ownership.” saying that it violated the right to bare arms. These people
are absolutely idiotic. We shouldn’t be at a point where there are people,
like me, who think that we should demand an IQ test for political office.
Restrictions, background checks, can’t own a gun.. yeaah. Ill just call my
guy.
I’ll take the pot for $200 Alex
Yes they should smoke weed before deciding on marijuana laws, but if they
do then they might tack on massive tax breaks to Taco Bell, Doritos, and
Mountain Dew!! But in all seriousness it is a problem for lawmakers to make
laws (or draft bills) based on ignorance not wisdom on a topic.
Let’s cut to the chase.
Big Pharma and the alcohol industry are *FrEaking OuT!*
Pot is nearly an existential threat to them.
Their flying monkeys called lobbyist have been released.
Thanks to this new law pot smokers are now free to be abused and victimized
by criminals.
I could see this being struck down.
What about guns that shoot bong hits?
guns that shoots pot
it is designed to be struck down- to obfuscate any decision on medical
cannabis overall. If they ride any bill with bullshit legislation, it gets
buried or tossed out- then you gotta start all over- and then the opponents
get to say that the public shot it down before so it is harder to get put
on the floor as a resolution, thus creating the real impetus behind the
game afoot… fund raising- both for and against the issue… that is what
it’s about.
I always hated those math problems. “If Charlie has 12 apples, then eats
one, what is the diameter of his mothers armpit hair?” They never did make
much sense. Anyway, I am outraged that they won’t people to choose between
weed, or guns. What a fucking joke.
I get my weed from a raging alcoholic. He gets so drunk he passes out and
falls over. Then I take his weed and leave an AA meeting schedule next to
his face.
The NRA won’t support Pot users using guns. Pot using gun owner are more
likely to forget to buy ammo or load their guns..- HA!
Ha Illinois is one of the most ridiculous states ever. Ive lived in
Illinois my whole life and thats completely ridiculous.
There was a good point made in another video about politics I saw a couple
of days ago. Mainly that when it comes to science and politics, the people
engaged in either field are opposed, on a very basic level. The politician,
in general, is a narcissist (not a clinical narcissist, mind you, just a
bread-and-butter variety) who thinks that he’s right in anything and
everything, and projects that. That is what gets you elected more than
anything else, when it comes to politics, because it’s all about
popularity. Not saying lofty goals and a down-to-earth disposition doesn’t
contribute as well, but nothing contributes quite as much as the rock hard
confidence you have in your own standpoints.
Meanwhile, the scientist isn’t like that at all. He looks for answers and
are up-front with that, as opposed to the narcissists assumption that he
has the answers, and projecting that to the audience. Sadly, that makes him
less electable, because people don’t feel secure with people who changes
their “opinions” in line with the current scientific understanding. There
are wide-spread misconceptions someone who isn’t rock-solid in his
convictions about anything and everything he says could one day switch to
“Let’s gas the jews” or something equally as abhorrent and horrid.
So, this is the sad fact of popular elections. It’s not primarily about
ideals, plans, being a common man or whatever. When it comes to narcissist
vs narcissist, there one with the most positive qualities will win, of
course, but when it comes to narcissist vs scientist, no matter how
superior and well-spoken the scientist is in his positions, the narcissist
will win. It’s about being a self-centered and overconfident prat, quite
frankly.
So, to get around this, we need a meritocracy. You shouldn’t be allowed to
assume a political position you’re not fit for, knowledge-wise, and you
shouldn’t be allowed to make any decision without consulting with
specialists in relevant fields, and abiding by their knowledge. And once
this was put in place we would see an immediate change. None of this two
steps forward, one step back bullshit. Real progress, not half progress one
fourth regress (and often more like 50-50 between the two).
I am unconvinced they think marijuana makes them dangerous, but rather slow
reaction time, more judgement etc etc but BUT.. same could be said about
vicodin and oxycotin..
Marihuana can cause Psychosis. That can make owning a gun interesting.
i smoke my gun, problem solved.
Who would consider marijuana? It makes you sterile, gives you man boobs,
unproductive, and a pain in the ass to be around. I’ve never put marijuana
in my body and I’m proud of that fact. More I can say about the most of you
here who sold your body out.
Yup the left isn’t immune in making dumb laws through I do love that NRA,
aka the ultimate watchdog group for gun rights, is refusing to make an
official comment. I guess it is hard to defend the rights of potheads to
own firearms after one of the biggest media events last ear being the
Zimmerman trial which involved labeling an unarmed teenager a thug based
partly on the fact he had smoke weed.
Umm You can’t have a law that makes you give up a constitutional right.
That would be ridiculous.
I think more people who own guns should smoke pot. They would be much safer
with them.
fingerprint for vicodin…was that a joke? :/
The total made no sense of course the pot smokers are going to choose pot
lol
That last statement by the guy on the right made me look up his name so I
can thank him properly and follow him on twitter. THANK YOU JOHN IADAROLA!
FUCKING THANK YOU! By the way awesome last name
That’s why we have a Bureau of ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, and FIREARMS.
Thank Jon, THANK YOU!!!
…well played government, well played.
+1 for the scientific method.
I bet the NRA is gonna be pissed about this…
two pucks and some weed, band name, called it.